Value Dual Socket-370 Motherboard Roundup - August 2001
by Mike Andrawes on August 24, 2001 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Synthetic Test - CliBench Mk III SMP 0.7.10 (CPU Tests)
Windows 2000 Professional |
||||||
CliBench
MK III SMP 0.7.10
|
Dhrystones
|
Whetstones
|
Eight Queens | Matrix | Number |
Floating
Point
|
ABIT VP6 |
2381
|
833
|
3286
|
73015
|
111006
|
11115
|
Acorp 6A815EPD |
2381
|
833
|
2714
|
78420
|
111400
|
11115
|
AOpen DX34 Plus |
2379
|
833
|
3286
|
70643
|
111005
|
11115
|
ASUS CUV4X-DLS |
2398
|
833
|
3286
|
66545
|
111824
|
11186
|
ECS D6VAA |
2392
|
833
|
3298
|
68131
|
111824
|
11191
|
EPoX EP-D3VA |
2386
|
833
|
3294
|
70311
|
111400
|
11115
|
Gigabyte GA-6VVD7 |
2376
|
833
|
3286
|
70134
|
111006
|
11115
|
Iwill DVD266-R |
2445
|
851
|
3389
|
70437
|
112865
|
11287
|
MSI 694D Pro |
2392
|
833
|
3290
|
68131
|
111452
|
11186
|
MSI 694D Master-S |
2392
|
833
|
3277
|
66239
|
111400
|
11115
|
The above table gives the results of some very CPU intensive tests. Since we used two CPUs for all testing, it's a very good indication of how good the SMP implementation is on each motherboard. Once again, the Iwill DVD266-R clinch the top spot, where it edges out all other competitors in every category except the Matrix test.
The Acorp 6A815EPD fluctuates between tests, where it scored very high in the Matrix test but very poorly under the Eight Queens test. Besides that, all other boards perform very similarly, showing that SMP has been implemented properly on all motherboards.
Synthetic Test - CliBench Mk III SMP 0.7.10 (Memory and I/O Tests)
Windows 2000 Professional |
|||||||
CliBench
MK III SMP 0.7.10 (Memory and Disk)
|
Memory
Throughput
|
Hard
Drive Read
|
Hard
Drive Write
|
||||
Max
|
Avg
|
Min
|
Max
|
Avg
|
Min
|
||
ABIT VP6 |
127932
|
19248
|
14994
|
13084
|
23486
|
22217 |
19248
|
Acorp 6A815EPD |
142983
|
16410
|
13943
|
12132
|
23486
|
21777 |
18220
|
AOpen DX34 Plus |
120453
|
19154
|
14037
|
10347
|
22944
|
24954 |
19834
|
ASUS CUV4X-DLS |
135040
|
19248
|
13382
|
11689
|
25221
|
21917 |
19248
|
ECS D6VAA |
115748
|
19320
|
14659
|
12132
|
25221
|
21143 |
18720
|
EPoX EP-D3VA |
121536
|
21787
|
17364
|
14279
|
27464
|
24758 |
21787
|
Gigabyte GA-6VVD7 |
121536
|
19457
|
14827
|
10916
|
27379
|
24627 |
21787
|
Iwill DVD266-R |
173622
|
20480
|
16806
|
14222
|
27379
|
24824 |
20480
|
MSI 694D Pro |
127931
|
15584
|
12828
|
11302
|
21823
|
19852 |
17747
|
MSI 694D Master-S |
127932
|
21787
|
16136
|
13653
|
29767
|
26432 |
21880
|
The second set of CliBench tests involve memory throughput and I/O performance.
On the memory side, the Iwill DVD266-R outperforms all other boards by a big
margin easily, not a surprise since it uses DDR memory technology while all
other boards are still using SDR SDRAM.
VIA has been criticized for their poor memory performance, and we once again
see that here since among the SDR boards, the Acorp 6A815EPD scores much higher.
Among Apollo Pro133A boards, the ASUS CUV4X-DLS jumps out a bit, mainly because
of its extensive memory tweaking options, while the ECS D6VAA falls behind in
memory performance by quite a bit.
Disk I/O performance is relatively uniform across the board, which isn't a surprise because these tests are usually far more disk limited than controller limited.
2 Comments
View All Comments
yelo333 - Thursday, May 12, 2005 - link
On the Acorp 6A815EPD page, there is a misspelling:largeer
Just search for it ;)
Oh, and don't ask me why I'm actually reading such an old article :P
29a - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link
I had one of these and a cool thing about it was that the CPUs didn't have to be the same speed.