HP Compaq NC6000: Upgrading and Maintenance

The HP/Compaq doesn't allow for much component access on the bottom side of the system. There is only a single access panel that reveals a mini-PCI slot. All of our systems came with Intel's 2200BG 802.11b/g WiFi card, including our NV6000.



Click to enlarge.


The keyboard is fairly typical for HP standards, but there is one thing that sets this design apart from the rest of the notebooks that have passed through the labs: keyed released design. There are four "keys"/switches on the upper portion of the keyboard that keep it locked in place. Most notebook designs incorporate the system's keyboard in a recessed manner, so removing the keyboard for maintenance, upgrading, cleaning, etc. almost always requires a screwdriver to pry it out part of the way, and thus scratching either the keyboard or the front bezel of the casing.

Dell's solution to this has been to design a small divot/recess into the front bezel of notebook's casing. This allows a user to lift out casing that secures the keyboard down (excluding the screws for the keyboard of course).

Note that there are two screws on the bottom of the system that need to be unscrewed before you can remove the keyboard by way of the four keyboard lock switches.



Click to enlarge.


There are two SODIMM memory slots that can be accessed by the user, here. Because our NC6000 system came configured with 1 x 512MB memory modules, we would in theory be able to upgrade to 2GB (2 x 1GB), assuming we dished out the price premium for the SODIMM 1GB memory module.



Click to enlarge.


The CPU is located in the upper right hand corner, which cannot be accessed by the user, unless the notebook is taken apart. For those curious, we understand it to be a socket design; instead of being mounted directly on the motherboard.



Click to enlarge.


HP/Compaq NC6000: In the Field (cont.) The Test
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gholam - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    IBM not performance machines? X-series, yes, but find me a performance laptop that weighs just over a kilo :) T42 on the other hand, can be configured with Pentium M 745 and Mobility Radeon 9600, which should give you pretty decent gaming capability. Of course it isn't as powerful as those Mobility Radeon 9800 based models, and the price ($3000-3500, depending on other components) is somewhat uncomfortable, but it's by no means weak.
  • Souka - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    Oh yes... I forgot to mention that I oversee the people who do the purchasing, repair, and I get feedback on reliablity of over 2000 units in the field and office....

    :)
  • Souka - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    Actually, I find these laptops between the IBM X40 and the T42.

    My company uses only IBM laptops both at the corporate level, the branches, and our sales force. Office workers use the T series...from the T20 on up to the T42p. (I'm typing on a T41 right now and will be using a T42 soon). The X series....from the X21 on up to the X40...are used by most of the sales-team....with some T series tossed in there.

    Let me say HANDS DOWN, that IBM has proven their value to us....Period. Occasionally we evaluate Toshiba, Gateway, Dell.....they don't last the mininum 3 year life cycle....

    For public use, I don't always recommend IBM...they're definetly not performance machines....Games? forget it...


    Nuf Said.
  • Gholam - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    #17, I'm a technician, and I can say this: HP assembly quality _SUCKS_. Really it does. It looks like they use 10lb hammers and chisels to make the parts fit somehow, and don't give a damn what happens afterwards. Some parts rattle; others are wedged in so tight there is no way to remove them without breaking something, and it's been the case with pretty much every HP laptop that I came across in the last couple years. I'm not a big fan of Dell either, but at least they are better than HP.
  • andyman7 - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    why not try testing some laptops besides the big name brands?
    im typing this on a compal cl56
    it is 6lbs, has a 1.7ghz dothan, 512mb ram, 60gb 5400rpm hd, 128mb mobility radeon 9700, 15in sxga+ screen, dvd/cd-rw, and over 4 hours of battery life when using light applications
    and i got it for $1600
    also what about the sager line of laptops?
    most of those are definately DTRs but should definately be looked at

    notebookforums.com has a lot of info on many other oem laptops too
    anyway, the cl56 im using has become REALLY popular so it might be a good idea to try testing one (if you can get a review sample)
  • stateofbeasley - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    Gholam - HP/Compaq is actually superior to Dell IMO when it comes to business notebooks.

    People sometimes say "brand X sucks," but don't realize that quality and service can vary significantly among a company's many product lines.

    As for Powerbooks - they don't compete with business machines like the nc6000 and D600. It would be more appropriate to compare them with Dell's 8600/D800 line and Compaq's X1000 type (widescreen 15" multimedia platform).
  • Gholam - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    #15, if there was a Thinkpad in the review, it would've been unfair, as no onther notebook vendor is even remotely close to standing up to IBM in terms of quality and engineering. I rank the top four notebook vendors in the following order: IBM, Toshiba, then Dell, and lastly HP/Compaq.
  • Boardmonger - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    Can we say IBM Thinkpad T42p? I would love to see it thrown in the review ;)
  • trikster2 - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link



    One thing that struck me is how much dell just seems to ignore how important battery life is. My D800 gets about two and a half hours, miserble. My C400 is not much better.

    I'm in the market for a laptop, considering everything including the macs and this review was very helpful.

    just want to say, since my above post could be taken negatively:

    Great review!
  • trikster2 - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link


    Another vote for the macs. For most business laptop use, as these are designed for they are fine subs for their pc brethern.

    I find it amazing that the 17" power book is only 6.9lbs close in weight to these ugly (comparitively) PC bricks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now