General Chipset Performance - PCMark Vantage

Futuremark claims PCMark Vantage for Vista is the most complete total system-benchmarking suite to date and our experience has shown this to be true. Futuremark designed the benchmarks to test the performance of each major subsystem - CPU, memory, graphics, and disk performance based on real world applications. The final score presented at the conclusion of each test run takes into account the results of each carefully tailored test within the benchmark suite.

PCMark Vantage - Overall

PCMark Vantage - Memories

PCMark Vantage - TV & Movies

PCMark Vantage - Gaming

PCMark Vantage - Music

PCMark Vantage - Communication

PCMark Vantage - Applications

The performance delta between the five boards is minimal in the final score and even in the individual test suites. This does not surprise us due to the memory controller being on the processor and our setups running the same components and timings. The primary differentiator would be the disk controller design implemented by AMD and NVIDIA along with chipset driver support under Vista. In this case, those differences are not measurable in the test applications that PCMark Vantage utilizes.

General Chipset Performance w/ mGPU Enabled - PCMark Vantage

Unlike the discreet GPU tests, we expected to see some differentiation between the chipsets but it just was not there. The difference between the top scoring 780G and the 730a chipset is only 2%.

PCMark Vantage - Overall

In the end, at least in these particular tests, any of the chipsets would be acceptable for a general application work.

Test Setup Media Performance
Comments Locked

38 Comments

View All Comments

  • homerdog - Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - link

    Don't get me wrong, HybridPower is a cool feature that I will consider when I'm making my next motherboard/GPU purchase.

    However, the fact remains that the HD3K cards have a significantly larger delta between their idle and load power consumption figures than the current crop of Nvidia cards. If ATI continues to build on this trend they may not even need a complex mGPU/dGPU hybrid solution to get idle consumption down to near IGP levels, although they're probably working on one anyway.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - link

    Now we just need Hybrid Power in laptops - where it should have been first, IMO! At the very least, HybridPower should have shipped with support for 8800GT/GTS 512 and 9600 cards rather than just 9800 GTX/GX2.

    Also, my two cents on GeForce Boost: hooray for an extra 20% over 20FPS. That sounds fine, until you look at the bigger picture. A GeForce 8400 GS or 8500 GT is terribly slow relative to most discrete GPUs. Sure, they cost $40 to $70 depending on model and features. An extra 20% performance (or even 50%) would be fine. However, a $75 8600GT is already about twice as fast and a 9600GT (with rebates available for $110-$120) isn't even on the same continent.

    If you have an IGP motherboard and you think it's too slow for games, I seriously doubt you're going to want to spend $50 to roughly double the performance. As any mathematician can tell you, multiplying any real number by zero is still zero. It may not be that bad, but I'd say 9600GT with Hybrid Power support is what people should shoot for. I figure that will arrive some time in the near future. Then just wait for it to show up on Intel platforms.
  • FITCamaro - Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - link

    While I agree with you, I think this is a great idea. An onboard GPU is always going to use less power than a discrete one. The main issue I'm concerned with is, does the system get back the memory used by the onboard GPU when the discrete GPU is in use? Granted it's only going to use 64-128MB of RAM likely, maybe 256. But still, those are resources that aren't able to be used by games.

    Of course it doesn't really matter for most since it only supports the 9800GTX and 9800GX2 and, in my opinion, you'd have to be stupid to go with the 9800GTX when the 8800GTS 512MB offers nearly identical performance. Heck even the 8800GT 512MB is only about 5 FPS different.

    They need to offer the hybrid power support across the entire 8x00 series.
  • BansheeX - Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - link

    Who cares about the Phenom? Where is the Intel variant, aka 730i? Another three month delay for that one? Sigh.
  • FITCamaro - Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - link

    People who want a Phenom.
  • DigitalFreak - Wednesday, May 7, 2008 - link

    Those mythical people exist?
  • KnightProdigy - Thursday, May 8, 2008 - link

    There are a lot of AMD fans. AMD still has a lot of loyal followers, maybe you forget that AMD had the speed crown for many more years than Intel. I have been an NV fan since it was STB in the early 90s, I, for one, like the fact that they are offering similar solutions, even though they lag a little.
  • Gary Key - Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - link

    We expect to see the Intel mGPU variants this summer, just in time to compete with the G45.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now