One Laptop Per Child: Charity, Prosperity, & Capitalism In The Developing World
by Ryan Smith on August 8, 2007 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
The Bigger Picture
Given the possibly lucrative market for cheap computers in developing nations, AMD isn't the only company making a push for that market. Similarly, given the mindshare offered by a program such as OLPC, other groups are looking at making laptops for distribution.
At least initially the biggest competition for AMD and the OLPC program has been Intel, who established their own OLPC-lite project called the World Ahead Program shortly after the OLPC program went public. The result is the Classmate PC, a laptop similar to the XO-1 but slightly more traditional in design and more importantly built using Intel chips throughout. Rather than taking a hands-on approach with the whole chain like the OLPC organization is doing, the Classmate PC is simply a proposed laptop that Intel will provide the plans and chips for and let other groups build. At least one OEM began production of the machine earlier this year, with a price tag of $225.
As of July 13th, Intel joined the OLPC organization, putting the future of the Classmate PC in jeopardy. Intel had previously dismissed the XO-1 laptop for various reasons, proposing their Classmate PC design as the more appropriate laptop. Given their movement to the OLPC organization, this is a notable if not sudden change in direction for Intel.
To put things in perspective, OLPC head and MIT professor Nicholas Negroponte was accusing Intel of selling the laptop below cost as recently as May of this year. For all of the for-profit parties involved, there's enough of a potential future market in for-profit machines to be fighting over a non-profit machine today. With Intel having joined the OLPC organization, much of the public fighting for access to the developing world's educational market should subside.
With that said Intel isn't completely out of the picture yet. Intel is working on its own competitor to AMD's Bobcat processor, Silverthorne, which would be similarly capable in low-cost, low-power computers for the developing world. Although we're left to speculate on just what made Intel finally join the OLPC organization, we can't rule out that they're being given a fair shot at getting into the successor to the XO-1 (whenever that becomes available). At the very least they will still have access to the same markets AMD does in terms of selling for-profit computers that are not in competition with the XO-1.
ASUS is the other major competitor to the XO-1 and the OLPC organization. ASUS will be selling its Eee PC, which is similar to the XO-1, later this year for a price suspected to be around $200. It uses Intel chips for its underpinnings, but it's not a Classmate PC. Unlike Intel and the OLPC organization, ASUS is not intending to directly get into education with the Eee PC; rather it's going to be a widely sold laptop for anyone looking for a cheap portable computer.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
22 Comments
View All Comments
thesafetyisoff - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
A few years back there was a scorpion epidemic in a town in South America. The government hit upon the brilliant idea of importing hundreds of chickens, which prey on scorpions, to take care of the pests. One month later there were still plenty of scorpions stinging people, because the villagers had eaten all of the chickens.Providing laptops to people who don't have electricity, can't read, and have no interest in education is a complete waste of money. Six months after this program is launched most of them will be broken, stolen, or sold. And the ones that are left will probably be under-utilized.
Ryan Smith - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
I think you(and everyone else who has made similar posts) make a good point, but are also in the process missing part of the point of OLPC in the first place.It is true that a lot of effort has been made to design the thing for use in extremely rugged/rural/poor conditions, but the fact of the matter is that's not where the XO-1 is going to end up at the beginning. Most of the nations planning on ordering the laptops are all nations in later states of developing, as opposed to being entirely undeveloped. These people have access to the basics such as food and medical care, and a lesser developed power and communication grid(e.g. you have power at school, but maybe not at home). In these situations there's no needs problem to solve, so the only real issue is of education: will the laptops provide the educational benefit the OLPC organization desires?
By the time the organization is distributing the laptops to the poorest nations and poorest children, we should have an answer to that question, which will make going forward a lot easier.
Sunrise089 - Thursday, August 9, 2007 - link
Ok - exactly. The laptop isn't going into the bush or the desert - it's going to places that can't afford $500, but maybe can afford $175. The problem is THE #^%$#& DESIGN OF THE LAPTOP IS BASED AROUND IT GOING SOMEWHERE IT'S NEVER GOING TO GO!Just looking at this thing, it's terribly obvious that some altruistic but naive designer pictured village children in sub-Saharan Africa or SE Asia using this, and then totally missed the point that the internet connectivity and power access just wouldn't exist.
Then people got a clue, and realized that a cheap laptop would work great in Eastern Europe, or heck, even sub-middle-class America. The problem is those markets need power and storage. They don't need wifi webs or waterproof casings.
I would ask one question to the project if I were given the chance - how does this ridiculous laptop actually serve the needs of the people who will actually be able to make use of it better than a used $175 laptop? The answer is it simply doesn't.
headbox - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
These are people that can't even feed themselves. A laptop will be as useful as a space suit. In Zimbabwe they kicked out all the white farmers to give to the "rightful owners" (because racial diversity is only expected when it means white countries) and the end result was mass starvation because they didn't know basic farming. Do we really expect people living in the stone age to make the leap to the modern era? It took thousands of years of social and technological advancements to get to where we are today... and now we expect an illiterate 3rd worlder to watch an animation on a laptop to bring them up to speed? LOL!Lemonjellow - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
Yes, because animated battles and speeches by the people in those battles can teach children about the effect of the Anopheles Mosquito, steam locomotion, or industrialization on global imperialism and/or the effects of capitalism on the developing worlds in which these children live!
Knowing about a battle means nothing if not taken in the context of it's cause, impacts, and there-for, what-for ,why-for, who-for, how-for, and all-fours (oh, wait no that last one is part of the porn feature)...
While a striped down not-quite-laptop is handy it will never take the place of a good teacher and a well written book, but it is better than the alternative......
of nothing at all...
acronos - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
Trying to take notes on a standard laptop is foolish (not quite so bad on a tablet pc.) The advantage of laptops in the classroom is to complement or even replace books. A truly good teacher is rare. However, software written and developed by a truly good teacher and development team scaled across thousands of schools can make a fairly positive difference. Teachers could choose competing software, similar to the way they choose books now, that complement their teaching style. Very few subjects would not benefit from this. Language - practice pronunciation. math - some of the best ways to learn early math already exist in the form of video games, science - see discovery channel, History - animated battles and speeches by participants ... etc. All of these will hold a child attention much better than a book. In addition, teaching how to truly use google could totally change society.slashbinslashbash - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
"the unit can safely be hooked up to any number of power sources, including solar or peddles."peddle = to travel around selling wares
pedal = a crankshaft system designed to be operated by the feet
saechaka - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
i thought i read that using the kids were using these laptops to view porn. i guess it's good we are giving them a way to see them naked ladies or guys.anyways, my point is that i don't think having a laptop will have a big an impact as having books and good teachers. i'd rather see the money on these laptops being spent on teachers and books
Roy2001 - Thursday, August 9, 2007 - link
I agree with you. Good teachers are more important.Verdant - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link
As someone who has tried to use a laptop in a classroom, I find the usefulness of each student having one minimal. Input for most subjects is not natural at all with a keyboard (want to sketch a diagram or anything other than basic text and bullets? - takes more effort than doing so by hand)Not to say that OLPC is not a valid project, just that people need to be a bit more aware of the fact that it will not perform miracles, and I don't think they are that valuable in a lecture situation.
The tablet pc is a good step, but the software available is limited, and such systems are clearly not fiscally feasible for something like OLPC.