Final Words

The performance of the third-generation Raptor is truly impressive from several different angles. While, at this time, we did not test the unit against the SCSI competitors with which it is meant to compete, we did find the drive to offer the overall highest performance in the SATA market. Like its predecessor, this is the drive to have if single-user performance matters over absolute storage capability. In fact, having this drive as the primary OS and game unit with a larger capacity drive for general storage would be an ideal combination.

Western Digital has addressed the shortcomings of its previous models with the addition of a 16 MB buffer, NCQ, and native SATA implementation wrapped in two different packages depending upon your tastes and budget. With the upcoming transition from the parallel SCSI Ultra320 interface to the new Serial Attached SCSI interface, the drive stands a very good chance at competing successfully in the entry-level enterprise market. The SAS standard offers interoperability with the current SATA standards. In fact, both standards utilize the same physical connectors, while SAS host adapters can control SATA drives. This also offers the opportunity for the drive to become a standard in the workstation market where, historically, SCSI has competed well against SATA based upon performance to price ratios.

In our thermal and acoustic testing, the drive offered average scores, but considering the performance and design of the drive, we could live with these minor annoyances in our main system. However, if you plan on building a silent system or using this drive in a SFF case, please understand that the thermals and acoustics will be noticeable.

We did witness performance decreases of up to 9% in certain benchmarks with NCQ activated. We will further investigate the performance penalty of NCQ in the near future with our revised benchmark suite. At this time we recommend turning off NCQ if this drive will be utilized in a single-user environment.

With a $300 price tag, 150GB capacity, and enterprise market heritage, this drive is targeted to a different market. While Western Digital desperately wants the drive to succeed in the server arena, they are acutely aware of the fact that the computer enthusiast will likely be one of the main purchasers of this drive. The Raptor X looks like the drive to have for the serious case modder, but we feel the additional $50 in cost is better applied toward buying a large storage drive for your system.

What is our recommendation? If storage space is not of prime concern and your budget allows it, then buy this drive. It offers the best single-user performance of any drives that we have tested to date along with the safety of owning a drive designed for 24/7 operation.

It took a few years, but Western Digital brought true excellence to a now mature product.

Hard Drive Performance: Thermal and Acoustics
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • jamescleant - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    I noticed you revised your acoustic testing, but this leads to a different ranking when compared to the one in the article :
    "Seagate 7200.9 160GB: The Highest Platter Density to Date!"
    http://anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2682&a...">http://anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2682&a...
    In the article mentionned above, the idle noise of the 500 GB 7200.9 is lower than the idle noise of the 74 GB Raptor, and in this article, it is the contrary.

    What is the explanation of this ?

    Also, did you test the acoustics of the Samsung SP2504C with the "old" method ? I am interested by the comparison with other models (I try to have the most silent drives).
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    I will detail a response tonight and test the SP2504c with the old standard.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    I am still working on providing the old numbers. I did locate the original sound meter used and will have it here tomorrow.
  • noxipoo - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    3 seagate 7200.9 in raid 0 vs 1 raptor? about the same price point, would be interesting.
  • mlittl3 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    See my post above. Gamepc did 4 rapters in raid 0 versus scsi and P-ATA drive.s
  • xpose - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Id like to see some raided drive scores as well. Because this drive is marketed at enthusists . . . good chance some will just buy two and raid them. Majority of the readers don't have scsi drives, so not sure why you'd choose those benchmarks over some consumer raided drives.
  • mlittl3 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    See my post above for raid tests.
  • Orbs - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    First of all, another great article, AT!

    So RAID was debated in the comments of the last HDD article AT posted, and while traditionally RAID hasn't shown much of a performance improvement, the fact that nearly all enthusiast motherboards now come with some sort of RAID controller and since the Raptors now use a native Serial ATA interface, the story might have changed.

    Can AT do a RAID shootout or something? I would be very interested in something like that.

    Again, great article!
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    We will have updated benchmarks or a new article with RAID results for this drive and others in the near future. Thank you.
  • Zebo - Saturday, February 11, 2006 - link

    Waste of time but I guess when the RAID freaks demand it they get it.



Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now