The Design: Sony DSC-T33
NOTE: We apologize for the absence of our standard studio product photos for the Sony DSC-T33. We took all the pictures and then lost the data to a weird flash card issue before we were able to post-process them. Unfortunately, we had already sent the camera back before realizing the images were missing. Below, we have extracted the product images from the user's guide.
Image courtesy of Sony
The front of the Sony DSC-T33 features a 3x optical zoom with a focal range of 38 - 114mm (35mm equivalent). The T33 uses the same type of folded optics that can be seen on the T1 and F88. Directly to the left of the lens are the built-in flash and the AF-assist/self-timer lamp. From left to right, the following can be found on the top of the camera: main power button, shutter button, microphone.
Image courtesy of Sony
The back of the T33 features a large 2.5" LCD monitor with 230K pixels. To the upper-right of the LCD monitor is the zoom controller that controls the optical zoom in Record mode and the magnification of images in Play mode. Below the zoom controller are the Display button and the speaker. Below this are the Menu button, Image size/Delete button, and 4-way controller with separate Set button in the middle. At the lower right corner are the Reset button and an access lamp that blinks whenever data is being written to the flash card. From this angle, we can also see the right side of the camera, which contains the main mode switch. This switch allows you to change the camera's current mode to Movie, Record, or Play. This side also contains a post for the included wrist strap.
Image courtesy of Sony
On the bottom of the T33, you'll find the multi-connector, which can be used to attach the camera to the included dock. To the left of this is a door that conceals the compartment for the battery and flash card. The T33 uses Memory Stick Duo flash cards, which are much smaller than the original Memory Stick. The camera comes with a 32 MB Memory Stick Duo; however, you will probably want something larger like 256 MB to start out. You may have noticed that there is no tripod mount on the bottom of the T33. Instead, the charging dock has a tripod mount. So, in order to "mount" the T33 on a tripod, you must first put the T33 in its dock and then put the entire thing onto your tripod. Obviously, Sony doesn't think that people use tripods very often. This served as a significant source of frustration throughout our review. It seems that every time we needed to take a tripod shot with the T33, we would forget to bring the dock. We're not exactly sure why Sony couldn't have just put the tripod mount on the bottom of the camera - it's not as if there isn't enough real estate for it.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
35 Comments
View All Comments
stephencaston - Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - link
Thanks for catching that Jarred, I've fixed it now.Tujan - Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - link
None of these cameras seem to get that soft lime-green colored square. Top right.What IS the true color of that 'Engineering Bldg.?
_____________
Which,or how well do these cameras work to create DVDs. How to determine this.Wich propietor has the best software. Wich software suite works best with wich camera to do so ? [ ]
.........
Most reviews miss this aspect of features for a camera.I've read for example,codec articles,wich tell of specificities of 'formats,and playback. Generally what you do with your output depends on how you want to use it though.Then what playback device/medium is wished to use. Some formats do not work so well with creation of DVDs.Or authoring. Those wich are most ubiquotous will give you most satisfaction for your camera.
You might think that for example,that favorite movie you caught would be great to send to grandma. You can't capture it again though. However its an extra step to re-process the capture. So quality count of a good camera becomes the question of being able to edit from its usable format.What each uses,and how well it keeps the original intented quality for the use you want it to.
Some Cameras will use the MPEG4 format for example.However the utility of editing this format to DVD is difficult to find exact detail from any reviews. In trying to keep of what you see is what you have using the Camera.
JarredWalton - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link
You link for the Sony movie clip is broken. You've got a ".jpg" at the end of the file name. The Canon looks pretty nice, though I'm still holding out for SLR. Give me a few more months....Thatkid - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link
number 21 it is possible i actually took a hard looka t my camera as well nikon sometimes uses diffrent metals in there cameras im speaking from my experiance using there profresional cameras and they feel plastic but i did open the bettery lid and its a pretty thick metal shell. But you are right it defenately feels diffrent from the sont and cannon. the sony is brushed stainless teel i belive and is ver hard. the canon sd400 feels great its a small and dense feeling camera. they are very diffrent and when compared to the feel of these cameras it deos feel as if it were plastic but compare it to your mouse of keybaord or some sort of video game controller and youll see its a wierd metal.stephencaston - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link
#19, thats interesting. The sample we reviewed definitely felt like plastic and made a plastic sound when I tapped on the shell with my fingernail. It felt nothing like the solid metal of the SD400 or the T33. It didn't even feel cool to the touch after leaving it in air-conditioning like metal should. Perhaps the body is made of a very thin metal surrounded by plastic. Either that or you and I received different versions.PrinceGaz - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link
That Canon SD400 certainly looks very nice, not as high a resolution as the top-end SD500 but a bit smaller and lighter than it which is important to me. If I needed a replacement camera, that would be the one I'd go for.It's worth noting that in the UK (and maybe other countries) the Canon SD400 is called the Canon IXUS 50, but apart from the name is otherwise identical.
Thatkid - Tuesday, July 19, 2005 - link
the nikon is made with an all metal body if you want to refrence that see Http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=2&productNr=25529the bottom of the page says in bold compact super slim metal body. i know this also because i own one.
my friend has a SD400 weve done all the posible real life senario test possible night time shooting in clubs both get the same exact looking prints some small discrepensies in color cast in the pictures but other then that same performance on both awsome cameras. one thing this article didnt mention is the annoying yellow cast in all the sony t33 pictures sony may advertise 1000+ shots for the t33 but with flash and normal usage checking you pics and that kinda stuff maybe 100 - 150 shots on one baterry. i had the t33 and returned it when i took a picture of the best buy roof only to find it looking extremly orange.
IceWindius - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link
Canon wins again, go figure. My A85 farking rocks, I love it!ShadowVlican - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link
w00t canon wins again, happy i choose an A95rubikcube - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link
Been in the market for a camera for a while and was considering the digital rebel xt for quality concerns. After I read this review, I decided that the quality wouldn't be that different, so I ran out and bought the SD400. Thanks for the great review.