Intel's Pentium M on the Desktop - A Viable Alternative?

77 Comments

View All Comments

• bob661 - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  The only problem with this chip is that the marketing is oriented towards the mobile market and therefore not a direct competitor to the A64. It would be nice if it was. It might bring some cats out of the bag on the AMD side. Competition in the marketplace is good for us all.

• jvrobert - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  Really, AMDroids, get a grip. You're all excited because the AMD chips beat a mobile processor pretty handily, and because you are making some silly assumption that the Pentium-M in its current form is Intel's "last chance".
  
  First, Intel doesn't need a last chance. They make enough money to make AMD look like a Mexico City taco stand. So enough of those delusions of grandeur.
  
  But on a technical front, if Intel ramps the clockspeed up to the 2.8 range (easy), and releases a desktop class chipset for the Pentium M it would match or exceed any current chip. And these are _basic_ steps. What if they made more improvements?

• jvrobert - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

• bob661 - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  #45
  You are a rock. The point of the article was to compare the P-M to desktop CPU's because most of us here wanted to know it will perform. And you know what? It performed very nicely.

• classy - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  I just can't help but to laugh at some folks. Its a nice chip but clearly not in the A64 ballpark. Its that simple. As far as the 2.8 oc, that was only accomplished in one reveiw. All the reviews show the same thing you have oc so it can it compete. What's interesting though is most of these Intel fanboys don't want to see a comparison of an oc'ed A64 vs a Dothan. Smoke city :)

• FrostAWOL - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  IF the Pentium-M and P4 are electrically incompatible then someone please explain this:
  
  HP Blade system Pentium-M with Serverworks GC-SL chipset
  http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/prolian...
  
  FrostAWOL

• jae63 - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  Great review & of interest to those of us with HTPCs. Too bad the price point is so steep.
  
  One minor correction on page 11:
  "The Pentium M does a bit better in the document creation tests, as they are mostly using applications that will fit within the CPU's cache. However, the introduction of a voice recognition program into the test stresses the Pentium M's floating point performance, which does hamper its abilities here."
  
  Actually NaturallySpeaking uses almost no floating point but is very memory intensive. The performance hit that you are seeing is because it uses a lot of memory bandwidth and its dataset doesn't fit in the L2 cache.
  
  Here's some support for my statement, by the main architect of NaturallySpeaking, Joel Gould:
  http://tinyurl.com/6s4mh

• segagenesis - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  #43 - I think you have the right idea here. This processor is not meant to be performance busting but rather a low energy alternative to current heat factories present inside every P4 machine. I would love to have this in a HTPC machine myself but the cost is still too damn high. Hopefully higher production will bring the cost down.

• Aileur - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  I guess the pentium M isnt ready (yet) for a full featured gaming machine, but with that kind of power, passively cooled, it would make for one hell of an htpc.

• PrinceGaz - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link

  #45- It was not an unfair review, on the contrary it seemed very well done. The reason the P-M was compared with fast P4 and A64's is because they cost about the same.
  
  Maybe someone else buys your computers for you, but most of us here have to spend our own money on them so cost is the best way to decide what to compare it with.