3400+/5950U: Workstation Performance


High End Workstation Performance - 5950U 3400+

High End Workstation Performance - 5950U 3400+

High End Workstation Performance - 5950U 3400+

High End Workstation Performance - 5950U 3400+

High End Workstation Performance - 5950U 3400+

High End Workstation Performance - 5950U 3400+

It is pretty amazing that the 250 Reference Board stands out so clearly in Workstation Performance. Here, you will see the flip-flop that we talked about in our tests with the ATI 9800 Pro on the K8N. The Reference Board favors nVidia graphics heavily in Workstation benchmarks, yet the 250 Reference was rather below average when Workstation benchmarks were run using an ATI 9800 Pro. The MSI is competitive with other Athlon 64 boards running nVidia graphics, but it is not the standout that we saw with the 250 Reference Board.

Conversely, the K8N performs very well running an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro compared to other Athlon 64 boards. These comparisons just point out some of the performance differences that can be achieved in tweaking for certain tasks or benchmark tests. One method is no more correct than the other here; they just represent different approaches to tweaking the chipset.

3400+/5950U: Gaming Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Monday, April 26, 2004 - link

    #1 - This is the same CPU that has not been able to run 3 dimms in the past. Stepping is AP. I was also surprised 3 dimms worked at DDR400.

    #3 - MSI states that the K8N Neo Platinum fully supports Cool'n'Quiet. We did enable it and it does appear to be working. We ended up disabling Cool'n'Quiet for our overclocking tests to prevent any possible interference from this feature.

    #4 - We will be changing standard test memory in the near future. Since so many tests have been done with the Mushkin/OCZ 3500, we continue using them so results can be compared to previous performance tests. We have also not yet determined which memory we will test with in the future.
  • NFS4 - Monday, April 26, 2004 - link

    #3, my Asrock K8S8X fully supports Quiet-n-Cool on my A64 3200+ It idles at 800MHz, then switches from 1800MHz and then to 2000MHz depending on load. But I'd say that 90% of the time doing normal desktop work, it's at 800MHz. The only time I see it spike up is when I start a game or when I do something really CPU intensive.

    But remember, in order to get it to work, you have to have it enabled in BIOS and download the CPU driver from AMD's website and set your power management in Windows to "Minimal Power Management"
  • Fr0zeN2 - Monday, April 26, 2004 - link

    Why do you keep testing with memory modules that aren't available on the market anymore?
  • mikeymasta - Monday, April 26, 2004 - link

    Theres been a lot of talk that no motherboard maker/chipset maker fully supports AMDs cool and quiet...
    Does any one know what the status of support is on this board chipset?
  • skiboysteve - Monday, April 26, 2004 - link

    i dont like this video card specific tweaking at all...
  • mechBgon - Monday, April 26, 2004 - link

    Very interesting that this setup can run three double-sided DIMMs at DDR400 speeds. What stepping is the test system's CPU, if I may ask? Is it the same CPU that was not succeeding at running three DDR400 DIMMs stable on other boards/chipsets?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now